Junction of Burnt Oak Broadway with Stag Lane and Watling Avenue
Received from Barnet Council 01/10/09:
Changes at the junction of Burnt Oak Broadway with Stag Lane and Watling Avenue
Contact: Manoj Kalair
Tel; 020 0359 7341
E-mail: manoj.kalair@barnet.gov.uk
Fax: 0870 889 7458
Date: 16/09/2009
Our reference: A5CR/Brent_Inform
The traffic signals at the above junction have reached the end of their serviceable life and need to be replaced. The London Brorough of Barnet has taken this opportunity to review the operation of the junction and put forward a scheme to improve both the safety and the efficiency of the junction.
The measures include some localised carriageway widening to encourage a better use of the available road space as well as the provision of staggered pesestrian crossings across the A5. A copy of drawing number 60554_Brent Infrom_01 illustrating the scheme is enclosed for reference [attached].
Work on the scheme is anticipated to start in November/December this year. Should you need any further information of clarification, please do not hesitate to contact my colleague Manoj Kalair using the above details.
Yours Faithfully,
Neil Richardson
Acting highways manager, traffic & development
Environment and Transport
London Borough of Barnet
Brent Cyclists current opinion:
This scheme straddles the borders of Harrow, Brent and Barnet, but appears to come entirely from Barnet's planners. We have seen this scheme before via Barnet Cyclists but this is the first time we have been contacted direct by Barnet about it. It is not clear that this is a consultation as it is not worded as such. However, we believe we should write to Barnet and possibly Brent and Harrow as well strongly opposing the scheme.
So far as can be seen from the very unclear plan provided, the bus lanes on the A5 near the junction are to be removed, removing the (part-time) protection and space they provide for cyclists. The two staggered pedestrian crossings proposed for the A5 (what we sometimes refer to as "pig pen" crossings) will make it time consuming and indirect for pedestrians to cross the road, as they will be forced to cross in two stages.
The letter mentions "safety" but provides no details of what the safety problems are supposed to be or how this scheme will address them. It appears that "safety" is being used as a vague excuse to do other things Barnet wishes, namely, remove bus lanes and reduce pavement widths in order to increase the roadspace available to private motor traffic.
There is in fact very poor safety at this junction at present, with a lot of speeding and red-light running. These measures are likely to make this worse.
We should oppose this on behalf of cyclists, pedestrians and bus users, and ask Brent and Harrow Councils to do so as well.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| A5 Burnt Oak drawing.jpg | 620.59 KB |
Links that have the following symbol attached 
refer to external sites, and will be opened in a new window
Comments
The way how you tried to
August 27, 2010 by parker, 1 week 4 days ago
Comment: 108
The way how you tried to explain some posts at here seems to me different.JN0-541..there are certainly different posts at here,but i didnt JN0-400 find any post related to projects like ...if someone have information about it,do tell me!Well any JN0-522 updates related to this post?if yes than do tell me!actually i came here while surfing net to get data related to projects of and find this post different oneJN0-532 Is there anyone having information about ?if yes than do tell me!Any updates?
Hi. I'm still here and like
July 22, 2010 by parker, 6 weeks 5 days ago
Comment: 79
Hi. I'm still here and like it so much.its so much interesting.I entered my first hp ase I found in hcse exam, . I didn't do a great interest in it, just picked up a few things. I'm sure icdl certification has LOTS of informations about the cisa certification.I'll share my 100% information there with you tomorrow! I love this!
Same old Barnet
October 4, 2009 by paul, 48 weeks 2 days ago
Comment: 44
I whole heartedly agree with David as the junction work is all about improving motor traffic flow which obviously impacts on other road users such as pedestrians /cyclists. The pig pens are so the motor traffic are seen to be at the top of the hierarchy and removing bus lanes throws cyclists into the mealy again where they most need more protection not less.
This is a busy junction for pedestrians due to the shopping area and could do with a crossing phase which is all red to motorised traffic allowing pedestrians to cross in which direction they require in one movement.
As per usual this is a car centric plan to our roads which is not a surprise from Barnet and as half the junction is on other boroughs roads hopefully they will have a more measured view to the improvements of the junction.
Minor cycle routes through
August 26, 2010 by parker, 1 week 5 days ago
Comment: 104
Minor cycle routes through parks also exist across Roe Green Park, round Gibbons Recreation Ground, round the edges of the Wembley Playing Field (between Tokyington Avenue and High Road, 350-030 but very narrow),70-640 across Vale Farm Sports Ground, Maybank Open Space, King Edward VIII Park, Roundwood Park and One Tree Hill Recreation Ground. At least, all these are shown in green on the London Cycle Guides, but the parks by-laws have not been changed,SY0-201 so the legality of cycling these routes is unclear. What can be said however is that Brent is not actively preventing responsible cycling on paths in any of its parks. 642-901