June 20, 2018
  • 4:56 pm Response to the Cycling and Walking Investment Stategy
  • 12:24 am Response to Kensal Corridor Improvements consultation
  • 7:46 am Response to the consultation on the London Plan
  • 10:03 pm Pentavia housing development planning application (Barnet)
  • 12:50 am Evidence to the GLA Transport Committee investigation into cycling infrastructure

Brent Cyclists responded to the Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy (CWIS) safety review consultation which closed on on 1st June. The UK Government “[Invited] those with an interest in improving safety of cyclists and pedestrians to provide evidence, drawing on experience from the UK or other countries, that can be used to shape future policy […]

READ MORE

This is the response from Brent Cyclists to the consultation on the Kensal Corridor Improvements. We are the local group of the London Cycling Campaign in Brent. We represent directly about 200 paid-up members who live in the borough, and we also attempt to represent all those who cycle or would like to cycle in […]

READ MORE

Responses below to various sections in the draft London Plan, with the links to the relevant sections at the top https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/planning/london-plan/new-london-plan/draft-new-london-plan/chapter-10-transport/policy-t2-healthy-streets T2 “We support this move to prioritise active transport over motorised transport.” 10.2.2 “Targets for active tranport, separate from public transport use, are required.” 10.2.6 “Distance possible by cycle is not purely dependent upon […]

READ MORE

The planning application for this site between the A1 Watford Way and Bunns Lane in Mill Hill is here. Further information on the Barnet Cycling Campaign website. This is a response to the application from Brent Cyclists, the Brent group of the London Cycling Campaign. We wish to object to this application, as the unsatisfactory […]

READ MORE

This is the response from Brent Cyclists to the consultation that ended on 3 January 2018. We do not support these proposals. We support the removal of all motor traffic from Oxford Street, but we believe cycling could and should be accommodated safely on Oxford Street with a clear design that uses a central, two-way […]

READ MORE

A response to this consultation, closed 15 December 2017. Do you agree with the proposed 20 mph zone? Yes Do you agree with the proposed zebra crossing facility near junction with East lane and three zebra crossings at The Avenue junction with Preston Road? Yes Do you agree with the proposed four uncontrolled crossing facilities […]

READ MORE

This is the response of Brent Cyclists to the consultation on¬†Kingsbury Town Centre Proposed Public Realm Improvements Scheme (closed 1 December 2017). We approve of this scheme, which is a major improvement on previous proposals, and on the existing design, but have some concerns on the design of the cycle facilities, as follows. 1) Surface […]

READ MORE

This is the response of Brent Cyclists to this consultation (closing 4 December 2017). This is the response on this scheme from Brent Cyclists, the local group of the London Cycling Campaign. We have to oppose this scheme because we want to see segregated cycle tracks on the length of the A5 through Brent and […]

READ MORE

This is the response by Brent Cyclists to this consultation. 1. Do you support our overall proposals? Support 2. Do you have any comments on our overall proposals? Overall these proposals are good, however some details fail to meet the high standards required for a comfortable, attractive cycling route. In particular the route fails to […]

READ MORE

The following is our response to this scheme (consultation closed 7 August 2017) involving new and improved cycle lanes in Park Royal. This is the response from Brent Cyclists, the local group of the London Cycling Campaign. We support this scheme, but would make the following points: 1) The contraflow cycle lane on Rainsford Road […]

READ MORE